Talk:Tales of Commons
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 19 May 2025. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:51, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
Undid edit
I will copy paste a portion of what I wrote in the Tales of Breaker's talk section to explain my stance on this :
The page Tales of Commons which was reverted back also featured official sources from either the Tales of Mobile archived website, or the Tales of Mobile Complete Guide with links provided, none of the informations were invented. To give on last comparision, the page Tales of the World: Summoner's Lineage has way less informations than that one and lacks sources as well. It could realistically just be a small mention on the main Tales series page but is not. This is why I think that if that one is important enough to stay, then the Tales of Breaker and Tales of Commons pages which features more content and valid sourcing are too. Leptitgay (talk) 12:35, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- User:Sergecross73, maybe you should jump in here too. The "article" as it stands is nothing but a basic description without any claim to notability, and no secondary references to prove any. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 15:23, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- With all due respect, how is this any worse than the ones I mentioned ? The Xenosaga Pied Piper article ? The Tales of the World: Summoner's Lineage article ? The second one doesn't even have anything to back it up but has been up for years. If there is a problem with the references and external links then I'd gladly fix that. Xenosaga: Pied Piper Tales of the World: Summoner's Lineage Leptitgay (talk) 15:32, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- I don't know if it is: I didn't look at them, and it's not relevant. There is a problem with the references: there are no secondary references. The links need proper formatting, with bullet points, and there's capitalization issues in the section. Plus I don't know if they meet the requirements in WP:EL. Drmies (talk) 15:36, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- Then I can just fix that right now. No need to delete the article. I was planning to do it anyway but I finished the basic framing at 3 am. So I went to sleep because I thought I could just do it later. Leptitgay (talk) 15:38, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- I don't know if it is: I didn't look at them, and it's not relevant. There is a problem with the references: there are no secondary references. The links need proper formatting, with bullet points, and there's capitalization issues in the section. Plus I don't know if they meet the requirements in WP:EL. Drmies (talk) 15:36, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- I have spoken to the editor at length about how all content needs to be be verified by reliable sources, so I do not understand their confusion when they receive pushback on their almost-entirely-unsourced article creations. Sergecross73 msg me 15:44, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- I am reworking the references section. Leptitgay (talk) 15:50, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- With all due respect, how is this any worse than the ones I mentioned ? The Xenosaga Pied Piper article ? The Tales of the World: Summoner's Lineage article ? The second one doesn't even have anything to back it up but has been up for years. If there is a problem with the references and external links then I'd gladly fix that. Xenosaga: Pied Piper Tales of the World: Summoner's Lineage Leptitgay (talk) 15:32, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.