Stephen Sutton has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 19, 2016. (Reviewed version).

A news item involving Stephen Sutton was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 15 May 2014.

This article was nominated for deletion on 5 May 2014. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography England Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"As of 4 May 2014, the charity has raised £3,183,116.50, more than triple the original goal." - the article goes on to state that the initial goal was £10,000, so surely the £3M+ total is more than 300 times the original goal........? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:27, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Yes: £10,000 was the original goal; £1m was the last goal. The donations keep on coming in (thanks people), but last time I checked the amount raised was £3,338,957.64, just over 333 times the original goal. Memassivbeast (talk) 13:58, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• I also think "original" implies that it was the first goal, so this might be a problem with clarity. Perhaps it's better to omit the phrase "more than 3 times the original goal" and simply talk about his goals later on in the article, in more detail? All Year Reindeer (talk) 15:41, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Or just omit the word "original". Clearly, by any rational understanding of the meaning of the word "original", the original goal was 10k, not 1m -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:43, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • In agreement with User:ChrisTheDude '''tAD''' (talk) 20:26, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Stephen Sutton/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 00:28, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to review. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 00:28, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fairly well-written, only a few comments: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 01:17, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• You may wikilink "bowel cancer"
  • I have changed it to "colorectal", which is the title of the Wikipedia article. '''tAD''' (talk) 15:33, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• In "Early life", perhaps add when the interview took place in the line In his final interview, to the Daily Mail...
  •  Done '''tAD''' (talk) 15:33, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• In "Illness and activism",

• The link for "spreading" is a duplicate link.
  •  Done '''tAD''' (talk) 15:33, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• will climb Mount Kilimanjaro in her son's memory It would be better to say "plans to climb" if this is a goal of hers.
  •  Done '''tAD''' (talk) 15:33, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• In "Documentary",

• Just curious, I wonder why the inverted commas in the quotes should look different. I think you can use the same template.
• Place some citations at the end of the first para, it looks unsourced just now.
• with his best friends "close friends" would sound more proper
• The documentary is currently in development and will be made into a feature-length film. Don't say "currently", say "as of 2016" (if this documentary is still under development).

• All done '''tAD''' (talk) 15:33, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• In "Death and reaction"

• You can place Chris' comment in a quote template
• You can simply say "Manford" instead of his full name, now that you have introduced him.
• On 21 May it was announced that a public vigil Announced by whom?
  •  Done '''tAD''' (talk) 15:33, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Wikilink BBC

• In "Music"

• You can simply say "bucket list", not "Bucket List"

• A dablink or two need to be fixed. [1]
  •  Done The other highlighted dab is for the hatnote at the top '''tAD''' (talk) 15:36, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No copyvio detected, images are properly licensed. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 01:17, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sainsf all queries have been responded to. '''tAD''' (talk) 15:36, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the response. This can be promoted. Great article! Sainsf (talk · contribs) 17:23, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The paragraph mentioning his funeral states "He was buried the next day". However the BBC News release used as citation does not explicitly state when his burial took place. I therefore question whether the citation should be regarded as supporting the statement. I would be inclined to rephrase the sentence "He was privately buried later" to fit what the citation says, though "later" is an open-ended term.Cloptonson (talk) 06:47, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]