Talk:Stan Lee
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Stan Lee article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
| Stan Lee was nominated as a Media and drama good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (November 14, 2018). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
| A news item involving Stan Lee was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 12 November 2018. |
| This It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 2 times. The weeks in which this happened:
|
| This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2018, when it received 11,207,360 views. |
| A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on November 12, 2025. |
| The following reference(s) may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
Wiki Education assignment: Communication and Culture
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 February 2021 and 14 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Alewi020 (article contribs).
RfC on Infobox image
I feel that a consensus is needed to establish which image is best for the infobox because the current image is poor quality and I feel that Stan Lee was better known/popular during his later years than his early years. Here are the options, please add more options if you feel they are needed:
-
Option A (current; 1975)
-
Option B (2007)
-
Option C (2014)
-
Option D (2010)
-
Option E (2006)
- Personally, I'm in favor of option C, good quality and captures what many of us remember him as. – 38.106.246.192 (talk) 16:19, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
- I agree. Option C is best. Pflesher (talk) 03:40, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- I personally prefer option A because it is more funny than the other options but C is still okay.
- )
- 73.15.236.14 (talk) 21:48, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
- I personally prefer option A because it is more funny than the other options but C is still okay.
- Option B is easily the best: it's of high quality and recognizable. Nurken (talk) 18:09, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 9 June 2024
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Stan Lee died in 2017 not 2018 2601:145:C201:DDB0:8916:D5E1:D20B:D303 (talk) 14:13, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Not done as incorrect. Trailblazer101 (talk) 14:19, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
courts don't charge people with crimes
"The Los Angeles Superior Court charged Morgan in May 2019 with five counts of abuse for events that had occurred in mid-2018."
should read
The Los Angeles Superior Court confirmed that Morgan was charged in May 2019 with five counts of abuse for events that had occurred in mid-2018. Pifvyubjwm (talk) 01:59, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Done It has been reworded. Trailblazer101 (talk) 16:06, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Stan Lee
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
- What I think should be changed (format using {{textdiff}}): AKA
- Why it should be changed: Leibovitz
- References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button): History Put all Stan Lee’s names under an AKA so it makes sense and tracks through history please.
~2025-31793-47 (talk) 11:26, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. NotJamestack (talk) 13:54, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
References
"Stan the Man" redirecting to Stan Musial and not to this page
Something I brought up a few months ago in the talk page for the Stan Musial page, and I'm bringing it up here since I got no replies on the subject:
Typing "Stan the Man" on the search bar redirects to Musial's page and not this page.
Personally, I think it's a mistake, and it should redirect here. Lee has arguably accomplished much more than Musial, he is vastly more well-known than Musial (when it comes to popularity, the niche "Americans-only" sport of baseball doesn't hold a candle to the international juggernaut that is comic books), and is the first person just about most people think about when they hear the words "Stan the Man".
I dunno, what's your take on this? Agustinaldo (talk) 11:45, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
- This is debatable. Most historical sources predominantly use that nickname to refer to the famous sports player. Because there can only be one primary target, there is a separate set index article for Stan the Man (nickname), which lists other individuals with that nickname, Stan Lee among them. That article is conveniently linked to at the top of Musial's article for anyone looking for Mr. Lee's article. If you did want to request the redirect target be changed, then you would have to raise your concerns with evidence and a strong rationale at our WP:Redirects for discussion page. — Trailblazer101🔥 (discuss · contribs) 16:02, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
- That strikes me as a very "Americans only" approach to it. Sure, most American historical sources use it to refer to Musial, but check out any Mexican, Scottish, Italian or Norwegian historical sources, and they'll mention Lee first, Musial second or never.
- That's because, again, baseball is unknown and/or mostly ignored outside the USA, while comics have international appeal. Agustinaldo (talk) 08:16, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- I assure you that I have no inherent bias or strong opinion on this matter. I just described how I perceived it. I do think there is a compelling argument to be had here, and as I said, that ought to be brought up by listing the redirect at our redirects for discussion page for the wider community to gauge input on it. Discussing this at Lee's or Musial's article could lead to inherent bias. — Trailblazer101🔥 (discuss · contribs) 18:10, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- Fair enough. Agustinaldo (talk) 20:21, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- I assure you that I have no inherent bias or strong opinion on this matter. I just described how I perceived it. I do think there is a compelling argument to be had here, and as I said, that ought to be brought up by listing the redirect at our redirects for discussion page for the wider community to gauge input on it. Discussing this at Lee's or Musial's article could lead to inherent bias. — Trailblazer101🔥 (discuss · contribs) 18:10, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.






