Talk:Springfield Three

Cox Hospital

I know about the whole WP:Not a Chat Room thing, but I feel this is extenuating circumstances, so hopefully the admins here will agree. I just saw an episode about this case on Disappeared on Investigation Discovery Channel. One thing that was mentioned that I'm surprised is not mentioned in this article is the controversy over Cox Hospital (a hospital in Springfield). In 2007, after an independent reporter got a multitude of tips about a parking garage at this hospital being the burial site for the three women's bodies, she got a mechanical engineer who had helped dig up wreckage at Ground Zero after 9/11 to scan the area with ground-penetrating radar, and he found three "anomalies" approximately the size and shape of human bodies buried under the parking garage. This was immedialy reported to the police, and the reporter and engineer both believe it is highly likely that the "anomalies" are in fact the bodies of the missing women. The police initially dismissed the theory because the hospital wasn't built until after the disappearance, but that's just it: it was under construction at the time! A construction site would be the perfect place to hide three bodies!!! After a little research, I have found that, incredibly, the police still have not carried out a dig at the site, EIGHT YEARS since the "anomalies" were found. If anyone is interested in adding information about this to the article, I found the information about the hospital situation on the "Streeter Family Blogg" website linked in the "external links" section of the article. I think this would be a very good way to get the word out to as many people as possible that this site needs to be investigated and that pressure needs to be put on the Springfield police department to do a dig there, as simply doing nothing about it is UNACCEPTABLE. Thanks. 104.12.60.211 (talk) 03:35, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.