Talk:SpaceX Starship/FAQ

Can I add LabPadre, Marcus House, What about it!? and other YouTubers into the article?
Unfortunately, no. The reason being that they are not notable enough. A notable person should already have a Wikipedia page (notable enough to be created) and have reliable sources covering them (notable enough to be mentioned). Sources such as YouTube videos, Musk's tweets, Teslarati, blogs, and more are not reliable, since there is no one to fact-check them. The few that are reliable are NASASpaceFlight.com and big news outlets in this case.
Uh, these criticisms part are invalid! Can I remove them?
Short answer: Please don't.
Long answer: These criticisms are valid since they have valid sources from verifiable websites. We need everyone, including SpaceX critics, SpaceX (responsible) fans, neutral about SpaceX, and even those who have never heard of it, to work on these articles for them to be as neutral as possible. Neutrality, not praise, is our goal.
There is a thrust puck being shipped to Starbase! Can I add that to the development history?
Sure, but it would be extremely cluttered with new-ish information being added to the end of the article. Only launches and RUDs (destruction) of test articles are added for that reason.
  • The lists of Super Heavy boosters and Starship vehicles are specifically made for documenting more detailed history, but please add a reliable source to the event. Something as minuscule as a shipment to Starship might not be notable enough for inclusion, please discuss this on the list's talk page.
  • Updates like FAA licenses, mishap investigation closures, etc, etc, however, go on the article for the flight test itself.
  • Major design changes, such as the Block 1, Block 2, Block 3, and Block 4 versions, go on the SpaceX Starship design history article after the previous version is no longer in operation. For example, the Block 3 -> Block 4 change will be able to be listed after the last Block 3 flight.

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.