This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC This article was accepted on 11 January 2015 by reviewer Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs). Space (defunct) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Space, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.SpaceWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceTemplate:WikiProject SpaceSpace

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE. Msc280 (talk · contribs) has been paid by SpaceOps.

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

A COI flag was added by @Theroadislong to this entry many years ago, indicating the close relation of the author to the organization. This is probably true and also I am working for this organization. However there never was a discussion started (as suggested by Wikipedia). Also the nature of the entry is that no tendencies or POV issue should affect the content. All content is referenced and is nearly completely a listing of checkable facts.

I propose to remove the tag if nobody objects. Maybe @Theroadislong would like to check again? Msc280 (talk) 08:33, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please the flag should be removed. Haneefputtur (talk) 17:26, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are a paid editor, paid editing is not the way Wikipedia has been built or should be built, it undermines our editorial independence, and we do not encourage it.

You can submit suggestions on the article's talk page with the {{request edit}} template and a reliable source. Theroadislong (talk) 09:34, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. [see below]

• What I think should be changed (include citations):
  • List the Workshops (http://spaceops.org/events/workshops/1050-2/) or https://spaceops.org/events/workshops/
  • List the post-conference book as a publication (https://spaceops.org/publications/spaceops-books/)
  • List the typical topics of the conference (https://spaceops2023.org/topics/)
  • Maybe list the plenaries (no public source for this)

All Information can be found on https://www.spaceops.org or the https://www.spaceops2023.org page

• Why it should be changed:

The article gives only very minimal information and was neglected for some time. If you compare to other conferences or organzations in the space sector like IAC or COSPAR, it should be enlarged and updated.

Further references: https://www.spaceops.org https://arc.aiaa.org/series/6.spaceops https://www.iafastro.org/events/iaf-affiliated-events/spaceops-2021-virtual-edition/2020-international-symposium-on-the-peaceful-use-of-space-technology-health.html https://www.showsbee.com/fairs/83127-SpaceOps-Conference-2024.html

Msc280 (talk) 07:32, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done references need to be independent, we have no interest in what your own websites say. Theroadislong (talk) 07:46, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]