Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Vanderwaalforces (talk · contribs) 16:19, 2 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: TheNuggeteer (talk · contribs) 01:39, 23 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this for WP:GARC. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 01:39, 23 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• March 10 and May 28 are only mentioned in the lead without a source; per WP:LEADCITE and the regular guidelines that means they are technically without citation.
• followed Enwezor's earlier project In/Sight (1996) this mention should not be in the lead as this is not substantial enough to be there.
• from Africa and the diaspora who/what is "the diaspora"?

• as the Guggenheim's 1996 survey what is this? most readers won't know what this is.
  • This was pretty clear though since I've mentioned the Museum exhibiting In/Sight above, but I just replaced with In/Sight. -VWF
• and representations of the body what body? a regular body or a different body? If it is regular, please change "the" to "a"
  • "representations of the body" here means the artistic and political ways in which African photographers depict human bodies, not one particular body, rather the body as a subject and symbol in their work. -VWF
• The last paragraph of Background (excluding the first sentence) feels more suited in the Exhibition section.
  • Did some copyedits. -VWF

• It comprised "over 180 objects" why do you need to put it in quotes? (I can't access the source)
• the role of the archive this seems pretty weird. It would be better to reword this to "the role of archives" as there is more than one international archives.
• the body and identity would be better if you omit "the" IMO
• I keep noticing quotes without attribution. Was the author of the quotes blanked? I really think you should add the author of the quotes.
• Erin Haney and Erika Nimis, art historians and curators specialising in the history of African photography... should this be in the reception section?

• Who is "Elizabeth Harney"? I think you need to add after her name "writing for the Nka: Journal of Contemporary African Art"
• was described add "by Harney" preceding this
• Just a suggestion, but these one-sentence paragraphs are annoying (for me). There is no reason to not merge them
• Before "Haney and Nimis" add African Arts'

• You can probably merge this section with Exhibition (unless you can find an archive of the catalogue or a reviewer describing it about what it talked about)

Nothing wrong here.

2. Y
5. Y
9. Y
19. Y

The spotcheck is good. Just waiting on you to fix the others.

🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 00:03, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanderwaalforces: completed prose review. Spotcheck will either be today or tomorrow. 00:31, 27 May 2026 (UTC)🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") [reply]

@Vanderwaalforces: re-ping (I forgot to put my sign). 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 00:31, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@TheNuggeteer Thank you... I addressed most of the comments above. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:24, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@TheNuggeteer please let me know which I haven’t tended to? Vanderwaalforces (talk) 02:34, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@TheNuggeteer Hello? Vanderwaalforces (talk) 05:47, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry! I am wondering if you have completed the comments under Reception, Exhibition, and Catalogue, since you have not responded. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 08:01, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@TheNuggeteer Yes, I have. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:05, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you! I will pass this now. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 06:54, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]