Talk:Side platform

New article Split platform

The article Split platform has been created, it is currently proposed for deletion as only an unreferenced dictionary definition, but may be possible to merge, or at least included in this article if a reference can be found, as mentions of split platforms in other articles appear to refer to a subtopic of side platforms. —Snigbrook 13:54, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For what reason are these ever used in elevated systems

They do nothing but make it a hassle, especially for new users who don't know which side to be on. Is there an advantage I'm not thinking of? Daniel Christensen (talk) 21:44, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Definition

The definition given in this article "A side platform is a platform positioned to the side of a pair of tracks" doesn't describe some designs that are described in their own Wikipedia articles as side platforms. For example, Forest Glen station begins "Forest Glen is a side platformed Washington Metro station", even though the platforms aren't to the side of the tracks; each platform is to the side of one track, but the platforms are between the pair of tracks, not the other way around.47.139.42.78 (talk) 22:34, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stub notice

Should this article still be considered a stub? It has multiple categories and a good amount of information, and the basic nature of the topic means there isn’t all that much to say about it anyway. Yellowleaf23 (talk) 13:08, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.