This article was nominated for deletion on 10 February 2017. The result of the discussion was redirect to Nick Knight (photographer).

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Fashion This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion Websites: Computing This redirect is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites This redirect is supported by WikiProject Computing.

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. Haileywendling (talk · contribs)

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. Pookylee (talk · contribs)

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. Mustardcreams (talk · contribs)

The founder and director, Nick Knight, was created an OBE last year and hardly needs Wikipedia for his business. He has a capable team but apparently no one very good at Wikipedia. They probably think they are being encyclopedic, more or less. In any event the article really does not read like an advertisement and only resembles one in a couple of passages, vaguely. Here the references broadly support them so we have no problem, because Wikipedia allows for it if they are reliable. The only peacock term that was in the article, "ground-breaking," I removed a few edits ago, yet it seems to have been added innocently enough. They would not have contributed all of these references if they were not trying their best to show the language is appropriate. The article could be rewritten a little but I have no time left to spare for the research this week. DinDraithou (talk) 23:33, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --

The content created reflecting the SHOWstudio Shop indicates the facts surrounding the context of an entity that is associated but distinct from SHOWstudio.com. I'm just trying to get the facts across, and thus utilize Wikipedia to the extent of what it was intended to do - which is communicate facts.

Mustardcreams (talk) 14:44, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• There are a number of options available here--you've edit warred to add promotional content, and several accounts directly preceded yours in this vein. I'll ask first that your account be blocked. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 14:48, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]