This article is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This organization article, apparently written by a former employee of the organization, fails to demonstrate a NPOV, in that it alleges that its favored small-government principles both maximize liberty and efficiency. Both positions are highly contested political positions subject to substantial scholarly, theoretical, and empirical disagreement.
Why is this guy sufficiently notable for mention? I went to the organization webpage and there is an entire board of directors, which he is not on. There is an entire page of staff members, and he is just some listing in the middle. The inclusion in this article frankly seems promotional. I am thus removing the reference to him, but if someone can add a referenced statement to establish notability aside from the fact that he is just a vice president, please feel free to add a new reference to him. Locke9k (talk) 15:53, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
To clarify, there should be some clear criterion for why he is listed and all of the board members and other staff members are not.Locke9k (talk) 15:54, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.
