Talk:Sam Quek/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Bait30 (talk · contribs) 20:27, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'll be reviewing this within the next week.  Bait30  Talk 2 me pls? 20:27, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

  • Lead looks good to me.

Early life

  • "(then) independent": should probably just be removed. I'm not sure this extra info about the school is useful in an article about Quek. Removing it would also fix a MOS:SEAOFBLUE issue. (3b)

Career

  • "and a few months later": I'm not sure what happened here because this is a new sentence, but it starts lowercase and with a coordinating conjunction. (1a)
  • "In 2020, she was announced...": saying that she was announced makes it seem like it hasn't happened yet, but later on it says she finished as a runner up. Should be reworded to be less confusing. (1a)

Personal life

  • seems good to me.

Images

  • Images are relevant and appropriately tagged.
  • For the Quek vs Argentina photo, I would recommend mentioning that Quek is the one on the right. (6b)

I'm done with the prose. I will review the references very soon.  Bait30  Talk 2 me pls? 01:10, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

  • All good.

 Bait30  Talk 2 me pls? 02:54, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking on the review and for your constructive comments, Bait30. Hopefully I've addressed your points; let me know if there is anything else to be done. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 09:18, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Checklist so far

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.