Talk:Sam Fisher (Splinter Cell)

Mutli-handedness

Added the fact that Sam seems to be multi-handed, as he can switch which hand he fires his rifle and pistol with in Chaos Theory. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.63.71.41 (talk • contribs) .

This isn't really a big deal, but in CT, if Sam is equally adept at firing with both hands (which he is), then the correct term would be ambidextrous, not mixed-handed, meaning dextrous with one hand in some things, and dextrous with other things in the other hand.J-stan

Kevlar fibers?

If I remember correctly, as of Splinter Cell: Checkmate his new suit was made of RhinoHide, a DARPA-invented version of DragonSkin. Is Checkmate considered caonical?

The games are more relevant than the novels. If one of the Splinter Cell games makes mention of his suit's material, then it should be regarded as correct. If a game does not tell something about Sam Fisher, but a novel does, the novel should be held as caonical until a game makes mention of the particular attribute.

Right-handed or left-handed?

The article mentions Sam Fisher is right-handed. Is there a source to confirm this? In the latest installment, Splinter Cell Conviction, he seems to be wearing his watch on his right arm, which is more common amongst left-handed people (right-handed people usually wear their watch on their left arm). This would also explain his ambidexterity, ambidexterity is more common amongst left-handed people. Quote from the Ambidexterity-article:

In modern times, it is more common to find people considered ambidextrous who were originally left handed and who learned to be ambidextrous either deliberately or during childhood institutions such as schools where right-handed habits are often emphasized or required. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.174.40.76 (talk) 13:01, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think that is convincing evidence at all for handiness either way; for example, I am left-handed and wear my watch on my left arm. Commonality does not mean irrefutable evidence, and regardless, basing anything in the article on that would run afoul of WP:OR. かんぱい！ Scapler (talk) 17:47, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't evidence for left-handedness, however it does provide reasonable doubt on wether Sam Fisher is right-handed. I'm not saying the article should be changed to left-handed, however the claim that he is right-handed should be sourced at the very least. 145.99.195.193 (talk) 20:31, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sam Fisher (Splinter Cell). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:41, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.