SS Samuel Huntington has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result July 23, 2008 Good article nominee Listed

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States / World War II This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history Associated task forces: /  Maritime warfare task force North American military history task force United States military history task force World War II task force Ships This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

The following text was unsourced and removed from the article:

The Huntington was bombed by German aircraft at 19:00 local time on January 29, 1944 while at anchor one half mile off South Beach, Anzio, Italy. The Ship had arrived from Naples, Italy with a cargo of ammunition, gasoline, and TNT, having sailed from Naples on January 28. She was at anchor waiting to be unloaded. Her complement was 45 merchant crew, 39 Naval Armed Guard, 13 Royal Navy personnel, and 5 U.S. Army personnel, making a total of 102 on board. Of this number, 4 crew members were killed in the attack and one died from his wounds on February 11.

At 18:00 local time, German aircraft attacked. Although there were several near misses, no direct hits were reported. The planes attacked again at 19:00 local time. A bomb struck on the port side behind the flying bridge, penetrated the decks and exploded in the engine room. Two more bombs struck on the port side below the waterline. The #3 and #4 hatches were blown out as well as the engine room skylight. Water rushed into the engine room and #3 – 4 cargo holds. The entire mid-ship structure was destroyed. Fire broke out in #3 between deck but was extinguished in an hour. A jeep stowed on top of #3 hatch was blown onto the flying bridge. Other vehicles on deck were blown overboard. At 22:30, another bomb struck the ship starting a fire. The vessel exploded and sank at 03:00 local time on January 30, 1944.

The injured men were placed in lifeboats and rafts, and later were taken aboard a landing craft for transportation to Anzio. The remainder of the personnel manned the guns, fought the fires, and helped with the wounded. They were forced to abandon ship at 21:00 on January 29, 1944.

If anyone has the source information for this, it would be nice to have some of the details added back to the article. — Bellhalla (talk) 00:20, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can determine, there are no photos—public domain or fair use—of SS Samuel Huntington available. — Bellhalla (talk) 11:01, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This review is transcluded from Talk:SS Samuel Huntington/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   "British cruiser Spartan was hit amidships and rolled over on her port side and sank with a loss 65 men." typo

   fixed — Bellhalla (talk) 03:29, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   "on the ways" - I'd prefer this be linked to what "the ways" are. I can figure it out in context, but what if I wanted to read more about it? Wolfpack should link to Wolf pack. On a side note, there should be some {{disambig}} tags there...

   linked "ways" to wikitionary — Bellhalla (talk) 03:29, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

   corrected link to "wolf pack" (also added {{otheruses}} to that page.) — Bellhalla (talk) 03:29, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

I've left comments, but the fixes are so minor as to be negligible - just don't forget to do them. Good read! —Rob (talk) 19:05, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on SS Samuel Huntington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081012220936/http://www.shipbuildinghistory.com/history/shipyards/4emergency/wwtwo/kperm2.htm to http://www.shipbuildinghistory.com/history/shipyards/4emergency/wwtwo/kperm2.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110929182443/http://www.convoyweb.org.uk/ports/index.html?search.php?vessel=SAMUEL%20HUNTINGTON~armain to http://www.convoyweb.org.uk/ports/index.html?search.php?vessel=SAMUEL%20HUNTINGTON~armain
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://ww2lct.org/history/stories/the_sailors_log.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:41, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]