This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Magazines Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article. Cold War Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Cold War on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Can someone explain the legal basis for limiting circulation of Soviet Life in the U.S.? Wouldn't printing restrictions be a violation of the first amendment? Maybe someone who was working at USIA at the time can shed light on how this reciprocal agreement was accomplished? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.26.136.19 (talk) 05:54, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now the article says "an editorial section allowed for politically correct criticism of the U.S. or international relations." This seems both vague and sloppy. Vague because we're not told what these criticisms were. Sloppy because political correctness is very much an American concept and the editorial policies of Soviet Life encouraged an Old Left criticism of the US, not a New Left-style criticism based on identity politics and such. Interlingua 11:44, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Political correctness" is meant in the (original) sense of being correct in the eyes of a political idea, rather than the euphemism-treadmill-type "PC" meant in the US. 118.90.23.195 (talk) 08:59, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I question whether or not this article is correct in describing this as a single publication. Soviet Life and Russian Life were separated by several years and by ownership. This should be split into two articles, with an acknowledgement that Soviet Life died almost 30 years ago.Unschool 04:07, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]