This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: National This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met Associated task forces: /  National militaries task force

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors: [[French Revolution#Storming of the Bastille|France in 1789]] Anchor French Revolution#Storming of the Bastille links to a specific web page: Storming of the Bastille. The anchor (#Storming of the Bastille) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before. The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error

The Honourable Artillery Company has been included in the list of Royal Guards. Whilst not certain, I don't really think that this is right - they're a unit far more closely associated to the City of London than to the Monarch (despite the fact that the monarch is their Captain General). Is this possibly being mistaken for the King's Troop, Royal Horse Artillery? The Thieving Gypsy (talk) 20:34, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Yes, while it is a distinguished (and very old) regiment the HAC has no particular link with the Monarchy or role as a Royal Guard. Suggest that the reference be taken out. In the meantime I have tried to tidy up this page by deleting the extended text under Royal Guards that followed. The first section was childish gibberish. The remainder was perfectly rational but had been cut and pasted from a separate Wiki article Queen's Guards (121.73.91.201 (talk) 21:15, 21 December 2010 (UTC)).[reply]
• Agree. Done.-The Gnome (talk) 07:25, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If we're listing units, then the Life Guards are missing, and "Queen's Guard" describes not a unit but a job performed every 24 or 48 hours by a different unit. If we're listing jobs, it should be "The Queen's Life Guard" and "Queen's Guard", although that does somewhat leave the Gentlemen at Arms, Archers and King's Troop out of it a little! To avoid too lengthy a list, could I propose "Household Cavalry; Foot Guards; King's Troop, Royal Horse Artillery; Gentlemen at Arms and Yeomen of the Guard (England) and Royal Company of Archers (Scotland), in the United Kingdom? CharlesSpencer (talk) 16:19, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Canada has had a number of Guard regiments, whos duties are similar to the UK counter parts including serving as Royal Guards. The Canadian Guards, Governors General Guards, Governors Horse Guards and Canadian Grenadier Guards. 204.106.234.244 (talk) 20:37, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]