Talk:Resistance training


This article is a mess. Its like someone rushed to type it in 2 minutes. It NEEDS citations at least. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.163.246.69 (talk) 04:22, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Empirical Findings

There are lots of important and useful findings of resistance training research. These should be placed in Wikipedia. I need to read the research more thoroughly first Ashernm (talk) 19:32, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Science of Resistance Training

If someone wants to rewrite this to be a good article, they have a fantastic research article they could summarize: http://faculty.pepperdine.edu/mfeltner/Classes/SPME330/ps1.pdf Ywaz (talk) 18:32, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Basic principles section

Not sure the last paragraph of the "Basic principles" section is proper. I think that the information could still be relevant but needs to be re-worded.MrNiceGuy1113 (talk) 22:18, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to strength training

This definition looks to be original research. It defines "resistance training" as a specific kind of strength training utilizing hydraulic or elastic resistance. Firstly, that is not the way the term is commonly used in literature whether academic or not. Secondly, what is the point of this distinction? It makes no difference to training where the resistance comes from, assuming it is applied in the same direction & resistance curve.

If no-one can give a good reason to keep, I will merge this article and its corresponding section into the main strength training article. ··gracefool☺ 08:13, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for now but clean up and add citations showing significance and contributions. --Maniwar (talk) 14:52, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - I thought much the same thing when I first encountered the article but assumed that it was some technical term that meant something specific to some group. If that's not the case it's just confusing. PRL42 (talk) 17:02, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I guess I thought the same as you till I read this article above. If I had time I would myself work on it, but oh well...C'est la vie. I would definitely ask that this talk page be merged as well so that that link could be utilized, if it is merged. --Maniwar (talk) 01:07, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK have merged. Feel free to work in that link to the article somewhere. ··gracefool☺ 03:08, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.