Talk:Reed–Solomon error correction
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Reed–Solomon error correction article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
| This It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shortened DVD
I am a new to Reed-solomon. Until recent,I am required to implement Reed-Solomon code on FPGAs. This will be used in our DVD project. However, I have some questions puzzling me greatly. In DVD error correction coding ,should RS(208,192,17) and RS(182,172,11) be shortened or puntured Reed-Solomon codes. I have no way to differentiate the two. Meanwhile, I have great eagerness to comminicate and discuss with others about ECC especially Reed-Solomon codes. My email is [email protected]
Regards!
Cross-interleaved coding
Is CIRC also used on DVDs.
Duality of the two views - inverse transform equation
Regarding the inverse transform equation for p(x), the equation is correct for non-binary fields , but for binary fields, the equation should be ,
The issue depends if the field is a a non-binary field, such a a field modulo (929) as used in the examples versus a binary based field GF(2^n) where addition is effectively xor. As a simple way to explain this, for a non-binary field: but for a binary field where n is an odd number .
Proposal to revert the following edit
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Reed%E2%80%93Solomon_error_correction&oldid=1282385894
Rcgldr given you're a big player on the RS page would you have any concerns? -TimeOfDei
- TimeOfDei - It's not clear to me what change(s) you are referring to and if the edit(s) in question were already reverted. Rcgldr (talk) 03:27, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
What is a Reed–Solomon-Code?
The article fails to explain what a RS code is. I have a code, but is it a RS code? What is it that defines this code? Some properties are mentioned but that does not define it. Moritzgedig (talk) 15:52, 3 August 2025 (UTC)
- Moritzgedig The article explains both of the encoding methods, "original view" and "BCH view" that are called Reed Solomon. What other information would you want included to define the code beyond how it's encoded? Rcgldr (talk) 03:29, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.