This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Systems: Dynamical systems Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is within the field of Dynamical systems. Statistics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

This article, while having some good information, needs some work. I will probably try my hand at this over the next couple of months.

"Put another way, a random compact set is a measurable function ${\displaystyle K\colon \Omega \to 2^{M}}$ such that ${\displaystyle K(\omega )}$ is almost surely compact and

${\displaystyle \omega \mapsto \inf _{b\in K(\omega )}d(x,b)}$

is a measurable function for every ${\displaystyle x\in M}$."

This is not obvious. And the phrase "put another way" might be obscuring the true logical relationship between the definition proper and this new statement.. Does the statement about the distance function to a random set being measurable follow from the measurability of K? Is it equivalent to it? In the latter case, shouldn't we remove the stipulation that K is a measurable function from the above formulation?

50.255.2.98 (talk) 22:12, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]