Talk:Process and Reality
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error |
Subjectivist?
Is Whitehead really a subjectivist? I've never heard him described in this way. I thought the philosophy of organism had more like a neutral monism than a subjectivism or idealism. --The Hanged Man 01:21, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Whitehead is not a subjectivist. As you say, if one tried to describe his scheme in otherwise established terms, one would be inclined to speak of neutral monism. That is essential to Whitehead's scheme.Chjoaygame (talk) 07:55, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
Process Philosophy
Someone who knows more about Whitehead than I do (I know nothing) might want to rescue an overzealous explanation of this book from the Process Philosophy page, which also needs attention. --98.100.207.38 (talk) 09:44, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry if the Process philosophy article's account, largely written by me, of Process and Reality is "overzealous". Please explain what that means, or suggest or enact remedies. What do you mean "rescue"?Chjoaygame (talk) 07:55, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.