Talk:Pride Total Elimination 2003

Interim Heavyweight Championship Grand Prix

There was no heavyweight tournament of any sort involved in this show or Final Conflict 2003. Removed the brackets and mention of this fictional grand prix. Edwardtang (talk) 22:20, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

The two PRIDE Grand Prix 2003 events are actually closer to being a single event with two parts, as such I believe the Grand Prix should be covered like 2006 NBA Finals with a single article rather than (up to) seven different articles. It makes more sense to cover the beginning and end of an event in one article. After merging, the article would be renamed 2003 PRIDE Grand Prix. I am proposing similar merges for all other PRIDE Grands Prix. hateless 01:39, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


They are seperate events and thus should stay seperate. Regardless if the tournament continues onto the next event, they are still seperate shows.


I think that the tournament fights should be on one page. i.e. PRIDE FC Grand Prix 2003. But leave the non-tournament fights on the event they happened on. Renny11


I think that the Total Elimination should be renamed to Total Emelianation. AnonymousBraveheart —Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.5.124.213 (talk) 06:01, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


just like the previous tournament, they are different events. i see no need to merge. this is NOT like basketball where there are many different events for a tournament. besides that they were released as separate dvds. also there are non tournament fights on the events as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.247.68.66 (talk) 01:50, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.