Talk:Polypore

I changed the definition of polypore since the old definition regarding continuous hymenium over the pore mouths is not a good character to differentiate boletes from polypores. For instance Gloeoporus spp. have continuous hymenium like many boletes. No single character does the job.

I also took the liberty of deleting the genus list, which to me appeared arbitrary. It's a good idea to have a genus list on the site, but it should either be comprehensive (e.g. based on Ryavarden's Genera of Polypores + recently described genera) or include a subset of well-known/important genera. In my view the genus listing is not a priority.

Antrodiella (talk) 03:41, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ecology

that section is listed twice, I hope some expert can merge it — Preceding unsigned comment added by MilanCela (talk • contribs) 21:25, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Minor correction needed

Deciduous is not a simile for angiosperm. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spydoo (talk • contribs) 21:16, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bracket tree

Bracket tree using for 223.228.58.171 (talk) 02:22, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Classification

Having 2 different tabs named Classification feels sloppy 50.5.240.91 (talk) 06:26, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: BIOL 412 HONORS

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 January 2025 and 25 April 2025. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ms2155 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Jonathand071.

— Assignment last updated by Jonathand071 (talk) 01:08, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.