Talk:Optical circulator

Non-reciprocal

I am confused by this edit, where the edit summary claims that optical activity "does not exemplify non-reciprocal optics". Is optical activity not non-reciprocal? I would think that it would be. A fuller explanation would be appreciated.--Srleffler (talk) 03:37, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Circulators are not necessarily fiber optic

Although most commonly available in fiber, optical circulators could be free-space, or chip-based. I hope to improve the article to reflect this sometime later, but if another editor could already start working on this, it would be great! Quantumavik (talk) 02:16, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.