Talk:Omphalion

Missing picture

Should there be a picture with this article? The last sentence sounds as if one was originally attached... User:Kayobee 7th October 2006

The author is effectively leaving a placeholder for such a picture of the Trebizond omphalos, if you have one. Another useful point to make is that an omphalos is often phallic.
It would also be useful to add details of the date the Greek omphalos was transfered from Delphi, shortly after Constantine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.29.93.129 (talk) 23:47, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-omphalos Coronation

The question whether the Westminster Abbey Cosmati Pavement has omphalic import is interesting, as it is apocalyptic rather than nascentory, the Omega to an Omphalic Alpha. Indeed, Lodon also has a distinct stone, the London Stone, often thought to be its original Omphalos, although it has been moved several times. Equally, a location in St Paul's Churchyard is often claimed to be that site. I have therefore added it as a footnote, rather than an integral part of the meme, because its design and use is evidently very similar to that of the Hagia Sophia. If anyone more knowledgable wishes to promote it, pray do so. It would also be interesting to search the Vatican for a similar pavement for the coronation of Popes, and possibly Aachen, for the Holy Roman Empire. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.29.93.129 (talk) 23:33, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Heliocentrism?

Why would the Omphalos represent the solar system orbiting the sun? Patallurgist (talk) 22:01, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.