Talk:Omega language

How can membership of $\omega$-regular languages be decidable?

If you say something is decidable unqualified then that means it's decidable by a Turing Machine. There is no way that membership of the language $\{a\}^\omega$ over the alphabet $\Sigma=\{a,b\}$ is decidable by a Turing machine. The articles on similar topics seem to make similar dubious or incorrect claims. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.172.100.253 (talk) 17:04, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


It's perfectly standard usage to extend the concept of decidability to other models of computation. See paragraph 2 of Recursive language. In this case, as the text explains, these languages are decidable with a Buchi automaton. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.252.62.244 (talk) 16:51, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.