Talk:Nick Fuentes


Program and influencer

  1. The article is currently a bit misleading saying 'America First' is a program. Per Wiktionary and Cambridge Dictionary definitions a program is a TV or radio broadcast. I have seen it described in newspapers as a livestream or podcast and this should be more clear in the article. Unless, of course, sources are consistently describing it as a program. Also, a link to the current broadcast format Rumble (company) would be appropriate.
  2. A lot, maybe the majority, of sources refer to Fuentes as an influencer and this should be worked into the lead.

Invite to @RottenEgg780 who edited the article recently. Just having another look at RottenEgg780's diff, I think the content was clearer and not watered down before the edit, but there a lot of changes in there to consider. Commander Keane (talk) 00:50, 29 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recommendations, @Commander Keane. I have added all of your changes to the lead-in section and hyperlinked the social media sites. Tell me what you think. RottenEgg780 (talk) RottenEgg780 RottenEgg780 (talk) 02:57, 29 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Much improved, thanks :-) Commander Keane (talk) 03:18, 29 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Fuentes' Support of the Democratic Party?

One of his earlier statements on the topic is mentioned in the article, but it might be interesting to include this one in the article. https://www.peoplefor.org/rightwingwatch/nick-fuentes-says-hes-voting-democratic-2026-weaken-gop-so-it-can-be-taken-over Redvelvetvanilaaaaaaaaa (talk) 17:40, 11 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Bias in article

The first paragraph describes him as a “white nationalism and white supremacy, Christian nationalism, beliefs associated with the incel subculture, misogyny, anti-LGBTQ views, and antisemitism, including Holocaust denial”. This seems very deliberate and treated like it’s not open to debate. It’s not objectively true just because “reliable sources” say this. It’s also obvious that this is deliberate since this article is literally protected after it was written/edited in this way so that the vaguely defined “reliable sources” can’t be cited in a neutral manner. Also, the article is tagged as being about “Latino and Hispanic” topics at the very top of the Categories box which seems intentional to try and claim that this “white supremacist” is actually Mexican and therefore not coherent which is very partisan if the case. It’s generally accurate but seems a bit misleading and flimsy for a site supposed to be neutral. Uplo85 (talk) 05:09, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There is no bias. All of that is objectively true. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-23720-77 (talk) 14:24, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Please see the FAQ at the top of this talk page. The term "reliable sources" is defined at WP:RS. The order of the article's categories is arbitrary, but the source-code for the page places them mostly in alphabetical order. The three relevant categories are not at the beginning of the list, so I don't know what you're seeing or why. Grayfell (talk) 05:28, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The categories box says, “B-Class Latino and Hispanic heritage articles” “Low-importance Latino and Hispanic heritage articles” “Latino and Hispanic heritage articles”. The article mentions the phrase ‘Latino and Hispanic’, but the categories use it thrice. Uplo85 (talk) 16:59, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
It's fully possible for people with Hispanic identities to also be white supremacists. Furthermore Latino & Hispanic does not mean Mexican. Instead it refers, at minimum, to people who descend from one of twenty countries across four continents where Spanish is an official language. Simonm223 (talk) 17:02, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The article states that Fuentes was born in Illinois, which is obviously not a Spanish-speaking country, and 'Anthropologist Sharon Moses has noted that Fuentes has emerged as a prominent white nationalist figure despite being part Hispanic, adding that he 'resigns himself that his father is half Mexican but prefers to not acknowledge it as a meaningful aspect of his identity'" so the multiple 'Hispanic/Latino' categories aren't relevant. Uplo85 (talk) 01:30, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I don't really care if he's in those demographic categories or not as long as they are not being used as apologia for changing our characterization of him as a white supremacist. Simonm223 (talk) 14:26, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
With that being said, 14% of the US population speaks Spanish which isn't nothing. Simonm223 (talk) 17:55, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Except he’s not part of that 14% so doesn’t matter. It doesn’t make sense for those categories to be Included when he’s not part of them (as already explained). Uplo85 (talk) 23:41, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Simonm223 and Uplo85: Fuentes being white supremacist is unrelated to whether we categorize him as Hispanic. Plenty of Americans are Hispanic or Latino and identify as white. That being said, I do think we should remove the categories related to Fuentes being Hispanic. WP:ETHNICRACECAT is relevant here: the ethnicity of grandparents (or other ancestors) is never defining and rarely notable when categorizing articles about people. One of Fuentes' grandparents being Mexican would not be a sufficient basis for being categorized as Hispanic in our categorization system, especially if he does not see himself as Hispanic. nomen alternativum (he/him • talk • contribs) 04:52, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. What I am saying is that his presence in those demographic categories should be treated as distinct from his politics. Simonm223 (talk) 10:08, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
To the original point about bias, this site’s rules state explicitly “Articles must not take sides, but should explain the sides, fairly and without editorial bias. This applies to both what you say and how you say it.” (Wikipedia:NPOV) I think it’s clear that this article does not follow that ruling. Uplo85 (talk) 23:24, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
That's not clear to me. What's biased about describing Fuentes as following white nationalism and white supremacy, Christian nationalism, beliefs associated with the incel subculture, misogyny, anti-LGBTQ views, and antisemitism, including Holocaust denial? That's objectively true. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:14, 5 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I already disputed the “objective truth” of those claims. No, they’re not. Uplo85 (talk) 01:32, 5 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
You saying they're not the truth does not "dispute" that they are when they're backed up with reliable sources. Speaking of, here's some sources about growing white supremacy among Hispanics, including Fuentes: [1], [2], [3] – Muboshgu (talk) 01:35, 5 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I think it is easy for people to fall into advocating for WP:FALSEBALANCE, sometimes without even realising it. Asking for us to hedge the facts here falls into that trap. --DanielRigal (talk) 01:00, 5 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 2 June 2026

Add Antisemitism under the Movement section ~2026-19683-20 (talk) 22:03, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure it is a coherent movement in the way that the other things listed are. There is a whole section explaining his antisemitism, so probably that's enough. That said, I'll leave this request open in case anybody disagrees. --DanielRigal (talk) 22:30, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Do not leave requests open if you think they are clearly incorrect. Your disagreement alone (with which I hereby concur) makes the request contested and thus not uncontroversial, which I also think it would have been regardless.
 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before posting an edit request.
happy editing, Slomo666 (talk) 17:50, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Old photo replacement

Can the photo of Fuentes be replaced? It’s 4 years old. ~2026-32822-85 (talk) 03:54, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

We have made multiple attempts to find a better photo but nothing better was found that we could use due to licencing restrictions. If you know of anything better then feel free to suggest it but please check the licencing first because we can't use most images that you find on the internet. --DanielRigal (talk) 10:28, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.