This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC This article was accepted from this draft on 6 September 2017 by reviewer Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contribs). Software: Computing This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE. 16912 Rhiannon (talk · contribs) has been paid by Beutler Ink on behalf of Citrix. Inkian Jason (talk · contribs) has been paid by Beutler Ink on behalf of Cloud Software Group.

While this article was being reviewed at AfC, a {{COI}} template was added by User:Gbawden. As no comments were shared by them about specific issues in the article, I'm guessing this may have been to flag to reviewers that it was written by someone who had a COI (my former colleague, User:Heatherer had written and submitted the draft on behalf of Citrix). Both Heather and myself made edits to the draft in response to comments from reviewing editors who initially declined (for notability), and the draft has now been taken live. I'm curious as to whether there's anything that needs to be addressed in the article or if the COI template can now be removed? Pinging Winged Blades of Godric and User:Eddie891 as they both reviewed the article at AfC. Just for full transparency: I have a financial COI as I am here on behalf of Citrix as part of my work at Beutler Ink. Thanks in advance, 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 18:51, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to Gbawden for taking a fresh look at this and removing the template. 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 13:42, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

Hello editors. I'm here as part of my work for Beutler Ink, on behalf of our client, Cloud Software Group. On June 27, an anonymous editor changed the parent company in the Infobox from "Cloud Software Group" to "Citrix". This is incorrect. While Citrix was the parent company, when it was acquired last year, NetScaler became a separate business unit of Cloud Software Group. Here is a source to confirm. Would someone mind changing the Parent field in the Infobox back to Cloud Software Group? Thanks! Inkian Jason (talk) 20:56, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Reverted to status quo ante    Spintendo  20:56, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This probably should go into the article, but I'm not sure how to cite it properly: https://medium.com/doublepulsar/citrix-forgot-to-tell-you-cve-2025-6543-has-been-used-as-a-zero-day-since-may-2025-d76574e2dd2c --Sigmundur (talk) 10:01, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]