This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography Women This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

@Kozmick: please provide a rationale for this reversion. All of the changes I made should be uncontroversial.

• The More footnotes tag is appropriate, as there are a number of external links but only one footnote.
• Per Template:Infobox artist, the URL tag should be used for websites.
• Per WP:BIRTHNAME, the subject's birth name should also be bolded.
• Per MOS:ITALIC, television series and newspaper titles should be italicized.
• "Selected works" is a commonly-used section title for biographies, e.g. William Schaus, Frank Magee, and Birgitta Lillpers. Nick Number (talk) 20:55, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kozmick: I am replying to your email here, as this is the best location for discussion about the article. To address your comments in order,

• The infobox photo was changed by Crazyseiko in this edit. I had no part in it. The same edit introduced the Unreferenced, Original research, and Incomplete tags which you just removed.
• If the relationship you mentioned is true then you should declare a conflict of interest. This would be a reason to include more third-party sources in the article rather than fewer, as extensive use of primary sources is discouraged.
• Characterizing my edits as "childish", "trivial", and "harassment" is not assuming good faith. All of my changes have been constructive and in accordance with Wikipedia guidelines. I primarily act as a gnome, and these types of edits are consistent with my normal behavior, not some personal attack. Nick Number (talk) 00:37, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Those tags stay, since as said above. --Crazyseiko (talk) 11:01, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Kozmick: Please do not continue to revert changes to the article without joining the discussion here. Doing so could constitute edit warring. Nick Number (talk) 21:20, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That user wont reply to anyone and has actually sent me to insulting emails instead of resolving the problems with this page, mainly because of the tags which are clearly needed. Page still has issues, and its pretty clear it may have to many pics. Its a shame we cant resolve this page. --Crazyseiko (talk) 21:25, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]