This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Philosophy: Metaphysics / Epistemology / Logic Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Metaphysics Epistemology Logic

In most cases i see such an word used, it´s as a synonym for methodology(closer to the epistemological sense of the term). Does it proceed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.33.203.27 (talk) 02:08, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no. Metatheory is very different from methodology. The page, as is, seems fairly accurate, so let it stand for the momnet. I'm in the process of developing a foundation for the advancement of social theory (a very metatheoretical endeavor). As we get underway, I plan to become engaged with this page. Until then, check out:

http://www.seedwiki.com/wiki/theory_of_theory/theory_of_theory?event=goto%20new%20wiki&hasDirectory=%27c:\inetpub\sevaSeedWiki\OtherPages\theory_of_theory%27&CFID=6671&CFTOKEN=62832487-3DEB-40E3-8EBED5F057061A8C

Thanks,

98.97.121.6 (talk) 16:48, 28 October 2008 (UTC) Steve[reply]

swallis [at] sbcglobal.net

The TOGA metatheory is completely unknown on four best universities:
http://search.cam.ac.uk/web?query=TOGA+metatheory => no results
http://www.harvard.edu/searches/?searchtext=TOGA+metatheory => no results
http://web.mit.edu/search.html TOGA+metatheory => no results
http://www.yale.edu/ TOGA+metatheory => no results
Vikom (talk) 00:18, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- Above mentioned data-basies are rather specific. We may see: Google search https://www.google.pl/#q=%22toga+meta-theory%22 - "TOGA meta-theory" -- 6.420 results " meta-teoria TOGA" -- 336 results.

We should notice that it is a theory rather for high-level specialists ... 151.24.128.4 (talk) 09:18, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vikom noted above that it's not found in the usual scholarly references, and the anon notes it is found on Google (or, at least, the Polish localization). This leans against linkage here, although it provides mild support for a TOGA article. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 12:33, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Metatheory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20030907103204/http://www.bsu.edu/classes/flint/comm360/metatheo.html to http://www.bsu.edu/classes/flint/comm360/metatheo.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:56, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]