This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: American This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm This article is supported by the American cinema task force. Science Fiction Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Comedy This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

budget - not 15mil - its 100mil http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0765476/business —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.0.116.97 (talk) 22:02, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IMDb is inaccurate; CNN reports that it cost about $55 million to make. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 21:42, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just stumbled upon this article and it has clearly been vandalized.

Rob Greenberg also redirects here for whatever reason. Frip 21:16, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter your personal opinions, do not vandalize. I've had to clean this one up twice and both times people have decided that their personal opinions are facts. Show some respect and, this is my personal opinion, grow up. Cbc1010 (talk) 21:38, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Bold when you see vandalism. Rgoodermote^{Not an admin}  23:45, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Premise similar to The Beano comic strip. Worth mentioning? Digifiend (talk) 13:35, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is it really that close ? And I am sure there have been other human shaped visitors from space controlled by small aliens. -- Beardo (talk) 04:43, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

at the bottom of the plot there is a error I don't know how to fix it yet but could some please fix it,

thanks -- User:SaiyanEmperor2008 19:06, 3 december 2008 (UCT)

"For people the spaceship seems fairly human, but odd and with superpowers." Haha. What? 86.131.98.77 (talk) 11:05, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The entire plot desciption is not much better than Gibberish. Obviously written by an Alien, or someone of limited intelligence or education - or both. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.197.15.138 (talk) 02:14, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

He is "the Captain". He has no number on his overall. He is never called "Number 1". Synopsis should be changed.--TeakHoken91.47.76.63 (talk) 21:04, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Meet Dave. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080716085622/http://www.cnn.com:80/2008/SHOWBIZ/Movies/07/13/boxoffice.ap/index.html to http://www.cnn.com/2008/SHOWBIZ/Movies/07/13/boxoffice.ap/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:30, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]