Talk:Mass generation

Status of theory of Higgs field

I write as one who has interest in this topic, but not enough expertise to contribute to it. At what point should this article be updated to reflect developments at CERN related to the discovery of the Higgs particle? I know that confirmation and acceptance of new findings such as this take time to achieve, and am wondering at what stage we are as I write, it now being some 21 months after confirmation at CERN. Have alternate models for mass generation now been pretty fully discarded, or is ongoing work into the breaking of supersymmetry now creating a need for revisions in the Higgs model, yet to be resolved? These seemed like questions it might be useful to address in the article. Evensteven (talk) 01:09, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say the Higgs mechanism should be given more prominence, because it is the most mainstream, especially since those CERN results. --JorisvS (talk) 11:43, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Standard Model description

I followed a link from the Higgs mechanism article to this page, so as to understand how, in the Standard Model, quarks gain a mass via the Higgs mechanism. Notably, this article doesn't really touch on this subject in regards to the Standard Model (or does so in passing), but mostly focuses on extended theories. I think it would be helpful to have a fuller description of mass generation in the Standard Model on this page, perhaps copies from where this info appears in other articles. 2600:4040:207A:AA00:1DE5:94DB:BCF7:2D95 (talk) 21:21, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.