Talk:Mark (given name)
| This set index article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
I've re-removed the link to "Safety Not Guaranteed", as per the discussion on Talk:Mark, which was the original source of this page. -Colin Kimbrell 19:31, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
Meaning of Mark, hammer
I recall that Marcus, is also a noun, meaning hammer in Latin. ANYONE??Coal town guy (talk) 18:04, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
Origin
In response to the IP user who removed the etymology on the grounds that "no one who knows enough Latin to know the claim is nonsensical? All references to "Mart-kos" come back to this page, and it's in contradiction of the actual citations at Marcus":
- Most people who speak English aren't experts on English etymology all the way back to Old English in the middle of the first millennium CE. So I'm guessing it's reasonable to suggest that you may "know enough Latin", i.e., Classical Latin, but have you traced the etymologies of words from Classical Latin to earlier times? Do you know Old Latin? It's possible that the attribution of *mart-kos even to Old Latin may be incorrect, as far as I know; maybe it should say PIE. But, anyway, to continue:
- Nothing at Marcus (praenomen) (you can't mean Marcus, that's just a disambiguation page) contradicts the language that was here. That article says the name is related to "Mars". That's what this article said.
- The stem of Mars as Mart-", as in "Marte," and "Martis". This is uncontroversial.
- The Latin suffix -(i)cus is cognate with Greek -(ι)κός and reconstructed in PIE as *-kos. These are all comparable to their English cognate "-ic". Based on that *mart-kos wouldn't necessary mean consecrated to Mars, but can reasonably be expected to mean "related to Mars". See wikt:-cus#Latin, wikt:-icus#Latin.
For the reasons I've given above, the claim in the article is, on the face of it, credible and reasonable, and your edit summary didn't give a valid basis for disbelieving the claim. On the other hand, it hasn't been sourced, so, while I'm restoring it, I'm also adding a {{citation needed}} tag. Largoplazo (talk) 02:21, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.