Talk:Mainstream

"Mainstream religion" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Mainstream religion and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 24#Mainstream religion until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:56, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Mainstream fiction" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Mainstream fiction and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 24#Mainstream fiction until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:57, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Mainstream audience" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Mainstream audience and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 24#Mainstream audience until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:57, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Mainstream market" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Mainstream market and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 24#Mainstream market until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:57, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Mainstream (terminology)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Mainstream (terminology) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 24#Mainstream (terminology) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:58, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Altenmann WP:PARTIAL does not apply as some sources will refer to this as just 'the mainstream'. Ex. here ("The paradigmatic topography of ghetto/mainstream marks a border on which is transposed the evaluations popular/serious, low/high"), here (" If the boundaries between SF and the mainstream are..."), here - "mainstream writer" (not "mainstream fiction writer") or [1] ("mainstream novel"). Also used in expressions "mainstream literature", etc.

On the subject of partial, btw, I am not sure if mainstream jazz should be included, as well as companies Mainstream Publishing and Mainstream Records. Shrug. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:55, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(ec) I say, per WP:PARTIAL, I disagree: there are quite a lot "mainstream" things, such as mainstream science, mainstream rock, All pages with titles beginning with Mainstream. And in all cases when spoken in a specific context they may be referred to simply "the mainstream", so this is a non-argument and the term simply means "something that is mainstream" with no special meaning. --Altenmann >talk 02:59, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
My reading of the partial suggests that anything that can be called "mainstream" fits here. So mainstream science, if sometimes called just the mainstream, should be here; unlike the companies I mentioned, which do not appear to be called by partial names. I'll ping for WP:30 User:Onel5969, with whom we recently had a discussion about another similar case (at Anglo-American disambig]]). Feel free to ping anyone else you think may be interested or advertise this discussion more broadly. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:09, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
WP:PARTIAL: Add a link only if the article's subject (or the relevant subtopic thereof) could plausibly be referred to by essentially the same name as the disambiguated term in a sufficiently generic context. - In a generic context, i.e., outside of the discussion of literature, "the mainstream" is not a unique identifier. If someone wants something mainstream, the "see also" section contains "All pages with titles beginning with Mainstream" --Altenmann >talk 03:21, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree regarding the context. The examples I provided are pretty generic; the term is used not just for literature, but also other works of art//fiction (film, games), and is used in newspapers, social media talk, etc. And there is a difference between all pages and relevant pages. All pages include junk like book or tv episode titles, etc. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:50, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.