Talk:Lusaka

Cleanup

Someone needs to fix this article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by DJDavis92 (talk • contribs) 01:12, 6 November 2006.

  • I made some effort to clean up this article. I added a city infobox to it, rewrote some of the text and did some other small chages. It still needs some work and references. More demographic information would be useful as well. --Lendorien 21:05, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lusaka City & Lusaka District

Is the City of Lusaka coterminous (shares the same boundaries) as Lusaka District? If so, there is no way that this district only measures 70 square kilometers. The city's own website seems to point to the city/district being at least 139 square kilometers. Perhaps only 70 square kilometers of it is developed, but the that would be a physical measurement or the urbanized area. --Criticalthinker (talk) 05:35, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@Criticalthinker, nice to see that somebody has asked this important question. At present, this article has got 360 square kilometres written as the size of the city (supposedly citing the city council's website) while the Lusaka District article has got 418 square kilometres written (citing the last census document to be published in Zambia).
So, it has made me wonder why Lusaka and Lusaka District should have the same population indicated if they can't have the same area indicated. It just does not make sense. Even the figure that is currently showing for "Metro" is debatable, as the number showing there most-likely includes the figures for "neighbouring districts" and not Lusaka District alone.
For starters, that "Metro" figure is going to be removed by me just now, as we do not need the numbers for "places that are not Lusaka" to add to any figures in this article. For the "Area", I will write what is written in the 2022 Zambian census document, which is 418 square kilometres (I will remove the "360" currently showing there). GeographicAccountant (talk) 23:50, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know Skenia (talk) 08:19, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of Lusaka

What is missing from the recently created city timeline article? Please add relevant content. Contributions welcome. Thank you. -- M2545 (talk) 14:11, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lusaka. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:07, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lusaka. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:16, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:25, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:52, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:09, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:54, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Population

Guys as per source it is saying that population is around 1,267,440, so where is the three million figure coming from Mindthem (talk) 17:12, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

'Southern Africa'

Speaking as someone born in Zambia, it's usually described as 'a landlocked nation in East Central Africa'. Mike163 (talk) 12:11, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That was true, but since the SADCC, now SADC, was formed, it's become more common to say southern Africa. Same with Malawi.
was also born in Lusaka Babakathy (talk) 16:37, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.