This article was nominated for deletion on 13 March 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments

Hi Walter, thank you for your effort to look into my contribution of Login VSI. At the delete discussion page you mentioned: "The included references are not discussions of the product but simply mentions of how the product is used "in the wild." I cannot find any references to support the notability of the subject". I have seen Login VSI a lot of times in technical white papers by different vendors in the desktop virtualization space such as Citrix, Cisco, Dell, HP and IBM. I thought that a reference to their white papers would indicate that Login VSI is recognized by these vendors as a notable VDI load generator and therefor shows notability as Wikipedia article. To help clarify this, I now also added page numbers to the references to show where the functionality of Login VSI is described. If you do not agree that these white papers shows notability, please let me know what I need to add as well. Thank you very much! Frontaal (talk) 10:40, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:N: "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article or stand-alone list." The various phrases are then discussed. "'Significant coverage' means that sources address the subject directly in detail". Mentions of their use don't meet that criteria as the subject of many of those white papers don't address Login VSI directly, they only mention it. Also, they don't treat the subject in detail. Walter Görlitz (talk) 13:55, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Login VSI. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131021001511/http://www.virtual-strategy.com/2011/11/01/qa-mark-plettenberg-login-vsi to http://www.virtual-strategy.com/2011/11/01/qa-mark-plettenberg-login-vsi

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:54, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]