Talk:Leaky dam

Untitled

wiki licensed images needed , please add after checking image license conditions

Cost effectiveness of leaky dams

It would be useful to cite the sources that show that leaky dams (and other natural flood management) are lower cost based on the reduction of flood risk provided than conventional flood risk management schemes. Various references[1][2] suggest that leaky dams may not be able to reduce flood risk on large floods in large catchments, so despite being cheaper than conventional solutions may not solve the problem Tim P (talk) 10:38, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


References

  1. ^ Dadson, Simon J.; Hall, Jim W.; Murgatroyd, Anna; Acreman, Mike; Bates, Paul; Beven, Keith; Heathwaite, Louise; Holden, Joseph; Holman, Ian P.; Lane, Stuart N.; O'Connell, Enda; Penning-Rowsell, Edmund; Reynard, Nick; Sear, David; Thorne, Colin; Wilby, Rob (March 2017). "A restatement of the natural science evidence concerning catchment-based 'natural' flood management in the UK". Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 473 (2199): 20160706. doi:10.1098/rspa.2016.0706.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: article number as page number (link)
  2. ^ Hankin, Barry; Hewitt, Ian; Sander, Graham; Danieli, Federico; Formetta, Giuseppe; Kamilova, Alissa; Kretzschmar, Ann; Kiradjiev, Kris; Wong, Clint; Pegler, Sam; Lamb, Rob (1 October 2020). "A risk-based network analysis of distributed in-stream leaky barriers for flood risk management". Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences. 20 (10): 2567–2584. doi:10.5194/nhess-20-2567-2020.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.