Talk:Law of Jordan
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Law of Jordan article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
British Mandate
Note on this newish article - Jordan until 1946 was a British dependency, and the king's council edicts applied to Jordan as well (The act of 1922 did extend previous Ottoman law) - and were incorporated in Jordanian law. While the British did not modify family law they did modify other areas - this was carried over by the independent Jordanian kingdom in 1946 - who subsequently repealed quite a bit of it. In terms of sourcing, this mentions this - [1] - but better sources are required.Icewhiz (talk) 12:31, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
West Bank
Note2 on this newish article - the law recognized by Israeli authorities in Israeli controlled areas of the West-Bank (the PA has its own system, which does continue the previous code) while in name Jordanian law (as it was in 1967) does differ in interpretation of Jordanian law (the Jordanians' claim that acts passed post-1946 repealed some Mandate-era legislation whereas the Israelis disagree (partly due to not recognizing the sovereignty of the Jordanian occupation (while recognizing the occupation itself)), see here - [2].Icewhiz (talk) 12:31, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- That page isn't available? What is the page range? I will ask at the Resource exchange - I'm already waiting on another source, once I get that I will put the request through. Seraphim System (talk) 12:50, 26 November 2017 (UTC) Seraphim System (talk) 12:50, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Argh - Google books availability differs by location. Pages 80-82.Icewhiz (talk) 12:52, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Islam
- @Seraphim System: Although Islam is state religion, it is in no way superior to the country's constitution. If the case was so, Jordan would have been described as a theocracy. But it isn't. Makeandtoss (talk) 11:42, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Legal History of the Modern Middle East
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2025 and 25 April 2025. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Reesegourley (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Ciara3905, Tessacann, AprilWyrm1, Strangevictory.
— Assignment last updated by Will Hanley (talk) 18:04, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Bibliography feedback
This is a solid list of sources. Please read or at least skim all of them to see if they are worth keeping on this page, however. What you list here should be generally useful, rather than narrow and specific. I suspect that the first source, on The Real Estate Ownership Law of 2019, may be too specific--but I don't know; you can decide.
You have multiple sources on family law, labor law, and criminal law. That's great; enrich the existing sections, and create one for labor law. Also you list a few sources about other topics, which will be helpful.
An example of a "good" article that you could imitate is Legal_system_of_Saudi_Arabia. To do this, you may have to read more general material about Jordan, to get the context clear. Understanding the refugee situation, for example, is pretty important, as is the question of who counts as a citizen.
These might help with some basics:
- ET Mogannam, "Developments in the legal system of Jordan," The Middle East Journal, 1952
- Rogan, Eugene L. Frontiers of the State in the Late Ottoman Empire: Transjordan, 1850-1921. Cambridge Middle East Studies 12. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Will Hanley (talk • contribs) 18:38, 20 March 2025 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.