A news item involving LauncherOne was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 21 January 2021.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Spaceflight Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Rocketry This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

After three years as a redirect, I have started a new article on this launch vehicle as of today. Article still needs a lot of work, but I think it is beyond stub level given the information already compiled when it was described in a subsection of the Virgin Galactic article over the past several years. Cheers. N2e (talk) 20:28, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's time to make a VG template... DRAFT:Template:Virgin Galactic (since the TSS template is inappropriately linking to some VG only topics (ie. the two "Spaceport X"es); while not linking to several other VG only topics (ie. VG corporate officers) ) -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 14:55, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So the engine part of the article still needs a LOT of work. They've moved on to plan for NewtonThree and NewtonFour engines, leaving the older NewtonOne and NewtonTwo engines as footnotes along the way. Need to firn more public secondary sources. Here's one with useful N3/N4 engine info; I'll add others as I locate them. Cheers. N2e (talk) 17:36, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• [1], Aviation Week, 3 Dec 2015.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on LauncherOne. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150720055529/http://www.virgingalactic.com/satellite-launch/l1-performance/ to http://www.virgingalactic.com/satellite-launch/l1-performance/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:11, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Description: Scale model of WhiteKnightTwo motherplane with LauncherOne rocket -- original LauncherOne design

URL:

• https://www.flickr.com/photos/davidgsteadman/7608012352/

License: Public Domain {{PD-author}}

Link To License Information:

• https://www.flickr.com/photos/davidgsteadman/7608012352/
  • https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/

Author/Copyright Holder's Name:

• David G Steadman / davidgsteadman / steadman.info
  • davidgsteadman : https://www.flickr.com/photos/davidgsteadman/

Article To Be Used On/Reason For Upload: LauncherOne / WhiteKnightTwo

67.70.34.69 (talk) 07:06, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I was a bit surprised to see that LauncherOne has a scheduled launch from the Anderson Air Force Base, Guam: (mission ELaNa 29 [2]) I'll leave this here for the editors more familiar with this launcher and launch sites. Cheers, Rowan Forest (talk) 17:22, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Closest US territory to the equator, probably? 13.5°N. --mfb (talk) 08:47, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rowan Forest it appears according to this article published in May 2020 that Guam was picked because "the island’s low latitude and clear launch trajectories in almost all directions." See https://www.c4isrnet.com/battlefield-tech/space/2020/05/08/virgin-orbit-gets-thumbs-up-for-space-force-launches-from-guam/#:~:text=The%20company%20believes%20Guam%20is,to%20effectively%20all%20orbital%20inclinations. Jurisdicta (talk) 06:44, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]