This article was nominated for deletion on February 4 2006. The result of the discussion was Keep.

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Pornography Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Pedophilia Article Watch (defunct) This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Pedophilia Article Watch, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Pedophilia Article WatchWikipedia:WikiProject Pedophilia Article WatchTemplate:WikiProject Pedophilia Article WatchPedophilia Article Watch

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. Lsmodelclub (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. Lsmodel (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

Anyone know if any subscriberd went down to the sites? If not, why not? Wasnt red lagoon just few years later mostly just nude sites as well or at least some of them? Yet they got a bunch of people in the usa at least plus to the naturalist nude stuff people in usa were charged same as like ahrdcore amterial. So I am curious did actual subscribers go down for ls studio? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.173.171.158 (talk) 10:56, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I think we should flag this article as needing sources for now. I still need to find more, but if someone would like to help me with it, I'd appreciate it. -Miku

Anyone know if any subscriberd went down to the sites? If not, why not? Wasnt red lagoon just few years later mostly just nude sites as well or at least some of them? Yet they got a bunch of people in the usa at least plus to the naturalist nude stuff people in usa were charged same as like ahrdcore amterial. So I am curious did actual subscribers go down for ls studio? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.173.171.158 (talk) 10:54, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see a single source for any sentence in the article. That's why this ahs been deleted time and again. Please don't restore it again until you're ready to cite every sentence.   Will Beback  talk  05:04, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Information has been added successfully from diverse sources. Everything is condensed here. ThLS-Studios: about the companyanks. Lsmodelclub (talk) 08:08, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Will Beback. I'm using the Talk section in order to discuss improvements to the article. Look the information I've written and tell me how is it. I didn't deleted what was written before. Just added some stuff that may be necessary. Lsmodelclub (talk) 08:25, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

These appear to be the exact same sources as are at 2004 Ukrainian child pornography raids, with the exception of some mysterious self-published webpage. The long list of videos is totally unsourced, as is the first section of the article. Please don't add unsourced material like this.   Will Beback  talk  08:43, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, man. That list is not unsourced. It's from the same "self-published webpage", that's why I've placed the [1] in the end of two tables! The first section of the article is very sourced. SOURCE STOPS UNTIL [1] APPEARS. All is in that "mysterious self-published webpage"

Please, man. Don't undo it again. I beg it!

Lsmodelclub (talk) 08:59, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Will. I'm tired, man. It's too late here and I'm falling asleep. Better we discuss it tomorrow, OK?

Lsmodelclub (talk) 09:10, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lots of sources have been added and deleted unnecessary information about 2004 Ukrainian child pornography raids in this article which just links to that one so we can avoid problems with duplicated information.

The information provided before in this article was very similar to the one in this article. No information about the company was provided before.

Lsmodel (talk) 17:44, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be that people here's too close-minded here about this kind of topics. That's why I don't visit Wikipedia frequently. Doesn't matter. I'm used to that kind of s****. I'm resigned and no more changes will be done by myself.

Here's my provided information for those ones who what to see a REAL ARTICLE and not the current one: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=LS_Studio&oldid=407503396

Have a nice day and don't be afraid because I won't come back anymore.

Lsmodel (talk) 18:00, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]