Talk:Kate Is Enough

Good articleKate Is Enough has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 24, 2012Good article nomineeListed
July 22, 2012Peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Good article

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Kate Is Enough/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 16:58, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    See comment section. Good.
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    See comment section. Good.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    Good.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    References included where needed.
    C. No original research:
    No original research found.
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    All major aspects of the topic have been covered.
    B. Focused:
    Article remains focused throughout.
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    No bias found.
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    Article is somewhat stable, please see comment section. Good enough.
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    All images are tagged correctly.
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    Images are provided, appropriate, and have suitable captions.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Pass!

Comments

  • "...fighting over a tennis racquet, which Cole broke, which was Rex's", wasn't the tennis racquet Hannah's?
  • The entire casting section of the article needs to be re-written. The entire section is written like this: This person who was cast as this person, this person who was cast as this person, this person who was cast as this person". You use the word "who" too many times and the paragraph (to me) sounds really weird.

I fixed some other issues regarding the wording of the article. The article will be on hold for 7 days to allow improvements to be made as well to see if the article undergoes any major changes. If you have any questions, feel free to leave them here or on my talk page.--Dom497 (talk) 17:22, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have addressed and fixed all of the issues. Thank you for the review. TBrandley 22:34, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have passed the article.--Dom497 (talk) 19:22, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.