Talk:KHSV

Moved from article page:

(Please note: While the author of this article believes that sometime between Sinclair's purchase and the switch to the WB affiliation, the station had another call sign change and was possibly unaffiliated, he is unable to find any data regarding such an occurrence. Part of the reasoning behind this is the possibility of a gap between KFBT's loss of the WB Network sometime in early 1998 and the adoption of WB Network by KVWB in March of that year. This, however, remains pure speculation without any evidence, based upon an extremely fuzzy memory from seven years ago.)
[Paragraph not written by, but only moved by] Guy M (soapbox) 09:01, August 16, 2005 (UTC)

Shouldn't that article be merged with this one? For one thing, KUPN and KVWB are the same station, just with different call signs. There's hardly anything on the KUPN article as it is anyway (and I don't think much else can be added to that article, without duplicating what's already on the KVWB article). -- Hinto 14:14, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Period between UPN & WB affiliation

I remember the period between the UPN and WB affiliation. As I remember, they used the call letters of KUPN for quite a while after becoming a WB affiliate. I remember turning KUPN to watch Star Trek Voyager and it wasn't on. Superman 3 was on. It surprised me and I remember there was some kind of announcement about it, but wasn't very clear about what happened.


If you visit [[1]], you'll see the May 20, 1998, version of KUPN.com. Don't know if this helps this discussion or not. Michaelcox

Article name

I have moved this article from KVWB-TV to KVWB. Consensus on both WP:NC#Broadcasting and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television Stations#Article names is that the article name should reflect the actual call letters of the TV station. As can be seen here: [2] the call letters for this station are in fact KVWB. Any concerns regarding this topic would be best addressed here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television Stations. —A 03:59, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Kvmy mntv.PNG

Image:Kvmy mntv.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:45, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kate Kelly 6 AM news?

Growing up in Vegas during the 1980s and 1990s, I watched KRLR too much to be good. At 6 AM, at least in 1989 onward, there WASN'T ANY 6 AM newscast of any kind whatsoever. Either COPS or Flintstones was on, or some other cartoon. I remember we'd all wake up early to watch the cartoons before going to school. Funhouse and Video Power were also some shows that KRLR throw around up there, as well. I've never heard of Kate Kelly nor a 6 AM newscast during the 1980s to the mid-'90s. Some citation would be nice to disprove the hours upon hours of VHS and Betamax tapes of the broadcasts I own. 12.192.184.60 (talk) 18:20, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I 2nd this. I just scanned throw Las Vegas Suns and Las Vegas Review-Journals from 1980 to 1994 for research (un-related project), and Ch. 21 never had a 6 AM news program listed in the local TV Listings the Review-Journal ever! I'm taking the statement out due to being 100% false. Apple8800 (talk) 04:46, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Move to KHSV

Now that the station's calls have changed, can this page (KVMY) be moved to the redirect page KHSV? KansasCity (talk) 04:18, 9 March 2016 (UTC) KansasCity (talk) 04:18, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 11 March 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: MOVED. KHSV is a tertiary identification for the airport; long-standing precedent that this is addressed via a hatnote where only two items need disambiguating. Mlaffs (talk) 14:23, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]



KVMYKHSV – Las Vegas station KVMY recently changed its callsign to KHSV, as of March 7. This is acc. to the FCC query. Csworldwide1 (talk) 08:51, 11 March 2016 (UTC) Csworldwide1 (talk) 08:51, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Not picking up ya'll channel over the air

Please help 2600:8801:3083:71A0:B1AF:9386:991A:DBEF (talk) 00:33, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Need a citation, obviously. Original research, but I find putting a cheap Dollar Tree antenna on the roof I get the channel. Can't add this to the article. 2600:8801:0:2B10:3830:EADC:B663:99D3 (talk) 03:26, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:KHSV/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 17:01, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: It is a wonderful world (talk · contribs) 10:07, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Note: @DaniloDaysOfOurLives and I are working very hard to review every single GA nomination in the television section. Consider joining us to clear the backlog!

Will review. This will be my 100th GA review and 50th of the backlog drive! IAWW (talk) 10:07, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Prose (Criteria 1a, 1b, 4) Magenta clockclock

Lead

KRLR and KUPN

Who won the comparative hearing?

Can "Black Mountain" be linked?

Link "KVVU"

had doubled in just four: "Just" is editorial

KWVB and KVMY

Suggest linking "The WB"

Sinclair struck a deal to operate KFBT: As an independent?

2014 license swap and sale to Howard Stirk Holdings

Link "KSVN"

and relocate KSNV's call letters: I think you meant "relocated"?

Man all these call letters are confusing me!

  • Not much I can do here! Just to write these two articles (KSNV too) I had to undo a partial cut-and-paste move!

Technical information

Looks good :)

Sources Magenta clockclock

Ref numbers based on https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=KHSV&oldid=1287494189 version.

Health/formatting (Criterion 2a) Magenta clockclock

The three TVNewsCheck references ([40, 41, 42]) are broken.

  • One of these I can't find on the live site, but the other two are. Hopefully running IABot will find an archive of it.

[36] is also broken (redirect)

Reliability (Criterion 2b) checkY

Spot check (Criteria 2b, 2c, 2d) Magenta clockclock

[6, 7]: checkY, though I'm not sure "boasted" is neutral

[21]: checkY

[37]: I don't see where it supports specifically that KFBT changed

  • Change of reference was required here.

[45]: checkY

Copyvio (Criterion 2d) checkY

Nothing found on earwig or the spot check

Scope (Criteria 3a, 3b) checkY

Covers the station's lifespan

Stable (Criterion 5) checkY

Media checkY

Tags (Criterion 6a) checkY

Captions (Criterion 6b) checkY

Suggestions (not needed for GA promotion)

Suggest archiving remaining URLs to prevent link rot

  • Definitely needed it here.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 14:21, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Explosion cloud of the PEPCON disaster
Explosion cloud of the PEPCON disaster
Improved to Good Article status by Sammi Brie (talk). Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 775 past nominations.

Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 18:49, 1 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • New enough (promoted May 27), long enough (9800 B), no copyvio (Earwig says 6%, and no close paraphrasing detected), well-sourced. Hook interesting and verified in source. Approving the image, but I'm not sure if I'd suggest running it with the hook, as an image of what just looks like some explosion probably won't draw in viewers. — Vigilant Cosmic Penguin 🐧(talk | contribs) 05:24, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.