Talk:Innermost inner core

First review

I've posted this message around one week ago, but in a different talk section! Hi, this is Alejandro Cabrales. I'm reviewing your article. Despite being still short, I see it's well structured. The lead is concise. The Dynamics section talks about an anisotropic sphere inside the inner core. It is necessary to explain the nature of such anisotropy (in propagation velocity, radial, etc.). Likewise, you can create sections about the two hypotheses of the innermost inner core (IIC) radius. The implications section suggests the interesting possibility of a different iron phase, and need more elaboration. In the figure I'd mention which of the phases illustrated would correspond to the IIC. The section of other explanations is good idea, reflecting what you mentioned in the lead, that the IIC theory is not generally embraced. Finally, I see that your references are solid.AlexInMetal (talk) 20:29, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Second review

Hi Charlie. I see better structure in your article, yet I feel you need to expand more the sections. My article is not the best of the examples, yet what I did was explaining different hypotheses regarding my topic, avoiding equations. For instance, you may elaborate more about the discrepancies in the traveltime models that led to propose the IIC theory. How has the people estimated the radius of the IIC? I also wonder if there might be (predicted) consequences in the magnetic field (Not 100% sure that these questions have answers in the available papers!). Finally, you may elaborate about two or three alternative explanations. These are my comments, hope they are useful! AlexInMetal (talk) 07:46, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.