Talk:History of Israel

Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 31, 2008Peer reviewReviewed

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 1 February 2025

"A stele of Seti I found in Beth-She'an, dating to ca. 1289 BCE, revealed that a Raham tribe lived in Israel. They were named after the biblical Abraham.[42]"

There is no evidence supplied that Raham is named after Abraham. The source only states that such a tribe exists. Michardav (talk) 16:58, 1 February 2025 (UTC)Michardav[reply]

Already done Looks like you and @Zero managed to get this figured out? (3OpenEyes' communication receptacle) | (PS: Have a good day) (acer was here) 12:31, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Raham named after Abraham

There is no evidence provided that this tribe was named after Abraham. Michardav (talk) 16:58, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Correct, I checked the source, and it's also obvious that there could be no such evidence unless the stele itself said so (which it doesn't). The relevance of this text is therefore in doubt and I'm removing it. The "Iron Age" referred to in the following sentence was, per the source, 500–600 years later so it isn't confirmation. Zerotalk 02:47, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also, the source calls them Rehem, not Raham. My Egyptian is not up to knowing how significant this is. Zerotalk 03:14, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
We have a source that mentions the possible link explicitly (Oltre la Bibbia. Storia antica di Israele by Liverani (2003)).
Possiamo pensare che i membri di questa tribù si definissero «figli di Raham» (*Banu-Raham) e che avessero come antenato eponimo un «padre di Raham» (*Abu-Raham), che è il nome del patriarca Abramo
English translation: We can think that the members of this tribe defined themselves as 'sons of Raham' (*Banu-Raham) and had as their eponymous ancestor a 'father of Raham' (*Abu-Raham), which is the name of the patriarch Abraham
As far as I remember, the vowels in Ancient Egyptian are not known for sure, so the discrepancy is probably not significant. Alaexis¿question? 10:42, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
"We can suppose" more properly. This seems to be pure conjecture since the text has neither "Banu Raham" nor "Abu Raham". Also it is many centuries earlier than any definite mention of Avraham according to Finkelstein. I don't think we should do conjecture here, but this might be suitable for Abraham if a more analytic source can be found. I see this conjecture in some popular works but not in serious Egyptology. The closest I can find is Albright, Bull. Amer. Schools Orient. Res. vol 125, 1952, pp. 24–52, who writes it as "Ruhma" but has a footnote "There is no basis for pronouncing the word Raham, with Grdseloff, though the verbal stem is obviously the same as in the patriarchal name 'Abraham'". Albright considers who the Ruhma are but never suggests a actual connection to the biblical guy. Incidentally, Albright calls the orthography "syllabic", so the vowels come with the consonants. Zerotalk 11:54, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, it's already covered Abraham#Palestine_origin_hypothesis. Not sure if it's due here as well. Alaexis¿question? 21:49, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 28 May 2025

The title "History of Isreal" is misleading. this is because the state Isreal was founded on 1948, yet the page talks about the history of the land. I would recommend to rename it "History of Southern Levant", "History of Canaan", "History of Palestine" or "History of the Holy Land" Aberkan2 (talk) 12:32, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: page move requests should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves. Day Creature (talk) 13:07, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The state of Israel was founded in 1948, but the history of Israel as a concept goes back for millennia. Nice try at erasing history tho. Metallurgist (talk) 21:42, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Is your point that the biblical "Israel", and the modern state (government) of Israel, are the same thing, and that the state of Israel is the fulfillment of biblical prophecy? And that anyone that disagrees is "erasing history"?72.180.111.79 (talk) 22:15, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps it should be titled History of present day Israel to be more clear. It didn't confuse me but I can see how it could be. ~2026-41824-9 (talk) 22:55, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Holocaust subsection

Did the holocaust have a role in the migration of jews back to present day Isreal? Why is this not mentioned? ~2026-41824-9 (talk) 22:58, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

POVFORK filled with Original Research

Sorry to be blunt but that is what this is. How can such an article exist actually? What sources discuss the Caliphate period as part of the history of Israel? This is quite unreal. Tiamut (talk) 14:11, 6 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that the POVFORK and SYNTH problems have been discussed raised before, and never addressed. What is the best way forward here? No serious scholarly sources discuss ghe History of Israel like this. Tiamut (talk) 14:21, 6 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.