A fact from High cheekbones appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 December 2012. The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that male features of high cheekbones and a strong jaw and chin are a sign of a high level of testosterone, and also an attractive physical trait? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Did you know archive/2012/December. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/High cheekbones.

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Anatomy: Gross Mid‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy Mid This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This redirect has been classified as relating to gross anatomy. Fashion Mid‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion Mid This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The content of the High cheekbonesHigh cheekbones page was merged into Zygomatic bone on 19 July 2017, and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article, please see its history.

After making some anthropological research I claim that high cheekbones should be mostly associated with people and ethnicities who have their deepest ethnic origin in Asia, that is: Asians (especially East Asians), Slavs (Eastern European and Eurasian Slavic peoples), and finally Native Americans (and therefore also some Hispanics). The one non-Asiatic exception are people of Black African origin, especially those from East Africa who also often have considerably high cheekbones. The only two things I can't understand are: how come Scandinavians were listed as having high cheekbones, and how come Italians and Spanish people are listed there too, while not so many people from these ethnic gropus have high cheekbones. Could someone present me some scientific, genetic or anthropological data about them having high cheekbones? I think someone is confusing strong jaws or PROMINENT cheekbones with HIGH cheekbones. "Prominent" does not mean "high". Nearly all high cheekbones are prominent, but not all prominent cheekbones are high. The same is with the nose. The aquiline nose - which is common among Native Americans, Semites (Arabs and Jews), Persians, Armenians, Indians, or people from Southern Europe and the Horn of Africa - is usually prominent, and not all prominent noses are aquiline or "hooked", but nearly all aquiline noses are prominent. 78.8.237.145 (talk) 19:55, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there isn't any ref for Italian, Spanish and Scandinavians. Also, I'm surprised that who would think that those people have high cheekbones? Anyway, since there isn't any ref, I'm removing those 3 but I'm not gonna remove EE people. If anyone adds ref to them feel free to change my edit. BöriShad (talk) 11:21, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The images of an ancestral species and a native american chief side by side seems unnecessary and likely to offend. 216.165.95.64 (talk) 23:18, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I read the article and the definition seems to be obfuscated by random pictures and verbiage dealing mostly (in my understanding) with prominent, mongoloid cheekbones, protruding brow ridges and large orbits.

In my mind high cheekbones means small orbits. 67.206.184.216 (talk) 21:43, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

But what if "High cheekbones" does refer to seem? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.55.56.235 (talk) 04:27, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]