Talk:Ground reaction force

Merge with Normal Force?

whadyur think?--Mongreilf (talk) 14:31, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It sounds sensible enough to me, if merged into Normal Force as a dedicated section, to which this article would redirect. Go for it if you feel like; I'm not planning to do it soon. Giuliopp (talk) 20:41, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm not good at wiki editing, so I don't know how to write a comment, but I think it should be merged, as this is essentially normal force. Maybe even just a redirect will be fine, deleting the contents. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.191.181.85 (talk) 03:30, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re-reading the article and in particular the first external link, I now think that Ground reaction force should not be merged into Normal force, since in its most generic formulation, the GRF is a vector with all three components relative to the ground different from 0, so it's not simply a force normal to the surface.
It also appears as though that GRF is a concept used more in Biomechanics than in classical Mechanics, so I'm going to edit the article to reflect that. --Giuliopp (talk) 14:27, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Biomechanics

I think this is actually more of a sports medicine term than a "classical mechanics" one. Perhaps a descriptive link to Normal force would be appropriate? 214.4.238.180 (talk) 18:47, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.