This article was nominated for deletion on 13 July 2018. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Google Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Google, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Google and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GoogleWikipedia:WikiProject GoogleTemplate:WikiProject GoogleGoogle Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Google To-do: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Articles for most of the other products listed here and here. Assess : All articles in the Category:Unknown-importance Google articles and Category:Unassessed Google articles using the project's assessment scale Expand : Google Mapathon, Google Talkback Maintain : This WikiProject Merge : Google Mobile Services into List of Google products Stubs : Category:Stub-Class Google articles and Category:Google stubs Update : List of features in Android and Gmail interface#Product integration. Update logos of Google Marketing Platform products Other : Add more stuff to this to do list if you like! (click here...) create: Help the Google article for a good article status Improve the Outline of Google Get more members using : {{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Google/Invite Members}} Infobox Images with transparent areas needing a different background color

The page says:

In 2009, total 8605 people competed.

But at least 10287 people competed. [1] says

8600 people solved at least one problem.

In a post to the google-codejam Google Group, a codejam administrator wrote this:

Right - you can only see people who got points. Counting people who downloaded at least one input, there were 10287 contestants. There may have been more people who showed up and didn't get anywhere, but we don't record them as having participated so I don't know how many there were.

71.124.184.16 (talk) 17:28, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So why don't you just go ahead and correct it? Don't wait until someone else does it. -- X7q (talk) 21:04, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Three of the external links point to a single person's blog/site (siddiq.info), whereas comprehensive stats are available at the go-hero site (which is even mentioned in the official GCJ website) does not find a place there. There are lots of blogs about the contest, and many with analyses of the problems, why is this one so over-represented here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.30.38.36 (talk) 12:41, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to incooperate the text in the lead into the table because it is redundant information, but then I realized they do not match. 87.79.112.227 (talk) 14:53, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It must be at least 26071, based on the number of users that submitted a solution for problem B. MoHaG (talk) 13:40, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The current number seems to originate from the number of users on the scoreboard (Which seems to be the number of users that got at least one problem correct) MoHaG (talk) 13:44, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am not very familiar with esoteric rules of Wikipedia community, and I am, actually, have not doubts about notability of Google CodeJam event. However, I believe, that its notability is similar to that of Topcoder Open events. Wikipedia community says Topcoder Open is not notable enough to have a dedicated article, and I see that, judging with the same reasoning, Google CodeJam article, in its current state, does not pass Wikipedia notability criteria either. Thus, these articles should either both left to live, or go down together! Birdofpreyru (talk) 22:13, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Google Code Jam is not open for Google employees, they go to other competitions like Facebook Hacker Cup
• Google has since 2014 a team-based competition called Hash Code, it may be interesting to note it here

Dam-io (talk) 17:45, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]