This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Science Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Systems Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is not associated with a particular field. Fields are listed on the template page. Business Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hi, I wrote this page based on a short but inspiring mission in the pharma industry. I have an IT background; could anyone with a more solid understanding of this topic do a review of the content? Thx, Hans

Hans,

Thanks for posting this GxP page. I have a suggestion: I would like to add GIP for Good Information Practices to the list. Then we could move and expand your IT discussion to a new GIP page, and expand the General GxP introduction. Disclaimer: I am a volunteer on a project (LSIT) to write and formalize GIP. Jmcneil86043 16:42, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've just read your comment.

At least in a pharmaceutical context, GxP jointly refers to the regulated good practices exclusively; i.e. (in alphabetical order) :

GCP - Good Clinical Practice

GDP - Good Distribution Practice

GLP - (preclinical) Good Laboratory Practice

GMP - Good Manufacturing Practice

GQP - Good Quality Practice (in Japan)

GVP - Good Vigilance Practice (in Europe)

In addition, QS - Quality System (practices) and RA - Regulatory Affairs (practices) could be considered being part of the pharmaceutical GxP framework; likewise for the medical device related Quality System (see 21CFR820: Quality System Regulation (QSR/QMSR).

Good information/IT practices), good business practices, etc. are not regulated and, as such, they are not part of the pharmaceutical GxP framework.

Since the pharmaceutical agencies are currently working on AI implementation within a pharmaceutical and medical devices context, we should maybe consider in the future to extend GxP to GMLP - Good Machine Learning Practice - if binding regulatory texts are issued about this topic. 2A01:E0A:2ED:11F0:742E:5463:D6DA:EBB9 (talk) 13:21, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good hospital practice has been added based on the following http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=allintitle:+good+hospital+practice&hl=en&lr=&newwindow=1&start=0&sa=N --222.67.207.79 (talk) 08:34, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Good pharmacy practice
  • http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=GxP&diff=170469848&oldid=164613089
  • Further information: Talk:GSP § Could GSP certifications be databased, so that....#Info about Good (Health) Service Practice

--222.67.215.129 (talk) 02:25, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GxP is a term used initially for regulated environment to indicate all law and regulations (e.g. Code of Federal Regulation) applicable to Pharmaceutical: Good Laboratory/Clinical/Manufacturing/Distribution Practice. The term should not be applied to guideline or similar documentation issued to standardize a good working practice: e.g. GAMP, GIP, GEP, GHP, etc. For that you should specify the specific acronym.

198.28.69.5 (talk) 13:01, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on GxP. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090118041436/http://www.fda.gov/cder/audiences/iact/GGP.htm to http://www.fda.gov/cder/audiences/iact/GGP.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090330133004/http://www.fda.gov:80/cdrh/ggpmain.html to http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/ggpmain.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:14, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ISPE has registered GAMP as a trademark and no longer uses GAMP as an abbreviation. See: https://ispe.org/pharmaceutical-engineering/january-february-2025/celebrating-25-years-gampr-americas. This is intended to emphasize that the GAMP guidance applies across all GxP areas within the life sciences sector. I would remove GAMP from this list… PassionateGAMPer (talk) 08:38, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]