Talk:Gnote

Citation for plugins

A citation is needed for the statement that Gnote is extensible with plugins. I could make a screenshot of the program with the plugin window in view. Is such a primary source appropriate here? I can't really find a good textual source. Another option would be to cite source code. Remco47 (talk) 00:52, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The statement is "A host of plugins extends the program to include functionality like exporting to HTML and printing support", and what I meant to question was the "host" of Gnote plugins, not the ability to extend it with plugins. An example of a good citation would be one that identifies a list of the plugins with a large number of entries. RossPatterson (talk) 12:02, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I see. It's probably not enough for it to be called 'a host of'. I changed it into the neutral "Plugins extend...". Remco47 (talk) 19:51, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid Argument

The article states Some Linux-compatible hardware does not officially support Mono yet, for example, netbook computers using the Loongson CPU (available in China). On these, Gnote is a reasonable replacement for Tomboy.. This however is not true. According to mono-project.com/Supported Platforms, the mono runtime is also available for the mips architecture. Since the idea behind having a runtime like mono is to have platform independence on the first place, the whole argument is highly invalid. --Mewtu (talk) 13:31, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshot

Does anyone have a screenshot, which he can upload here? --79.224.249.227 (talk) 22:11, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.