This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Medicine: Neurology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Neurology task force (assessed as Mid-importance). Running This article is within the scope of WikiProject Running, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of running on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RunningWikipedia:WikiProject RunningTemplate:WikiProject RunningRunning ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. To-do list: edit history watch purge tag all running related articles with {{WikiProject Running}} adding assessment and importance parameters when missing find references for articles listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Running/Unreferenced BLPs adopt an article and promote it to GA Chiropractic Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chiropractic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chiropractic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChiropracticWikipedia:WikiProject ChiropracticTemplate:WikiProject ChiropracticChiropractic Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Can someone rewrite the lead para in English please (not medical jargon)?--Light current 03:14, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is much more to this field than you seem to imply see e.g. http://www.liv.ac.uk/premog http://www.rvc.ac.uk/SML and so many more. We could contribute to locomotor/gait if you only ask.

--Russ 23:55, 7 April 2006 (UTC)Nyalathotep[reply]

I am proposing removing the Wikiproject Law Enforcement tag because there seems to be insufficient content for it to be included in the scope of the wikiproject. Let me know what everyone thinks EMT1871 01:14, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removal agreed SGGH 12:42, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An image used in this article, File:Tiempo tabla.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 7 December 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:23, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gait analysis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927203338/http://journalsip.astm.org/JOURNALS/FORENSIC/PAGES/4706.htm to http://journalsip.astm.org/JOURNALS/FORENSIC/PAGES/4706.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:32, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The study encompasses quantification (i.e. introduction and analysis of measurable parameters of gaits), as well as interpretation, i.e. drawing various conclusions about the animal (health, age, size, weight, speed etc.) from its gait pattern.

You can't manage parallel parenthesization around the double "i.e." stuffed in one sentence because you're also determined to stuff a list in the second clause ending with "etc."

That's a sure sign you're doing it wrong. — MaxEnt 03:20, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]