This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Telecommunications Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Question: Where is the proof for this?

This could be much clearer ... the intention here is to elucidate not obscure!
Is the symbol for the FWHM ${\displaystyle \Gamma }$? (Elvenlord Elrond) what the hell you are taken about —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.70.15.250 (talk) 02:16, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Should we have some examples of the FWHM for different peak functions? (Elvenlord Elrond)

I think that special examples of FWHM are important, but only if they tend to occur often. The Normal distribution has the funny property that many real world examples can be modeled by it well. However, I would try to avoid making too many examples - that is something for another website 64.111.68.194 19:21, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the FWHM for a gaussian function should be rounded to 2.355σ, not 2.354σ. Same with the following part, 2.634 Skwoy 17:04, 5 July 2007 (UTC)skwoy[reply]

In NMR there is a concept of half-width of the signal. Does this half-width (or halfwidth) correspond to FWHM? Kazkaskazkasako (talk) 09:15, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FWHM = 2 * HWHM Kazkaskazkasako (talk) 17:18, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is the term "half-width" ambiguous? Could it mean the full-width at half maximum, or the half-width at half maximum? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.215.138.131 (talk) 10:42, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Half-power beamwidth and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 6#Half-power beamwidth until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:32, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]