The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, use the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

History High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

i edit some parts of the article, who need a more serious rework (which unfortunately i dont have time). The continous presence of a Dacian population is prouved by more then simple archeology (pottery, burial rites etc.) There is studies of ethnologists including the big one called "Atlasul Etnografic Roman" who deal with folklore, mythology, old believes, pre-christian believes (most likely Dacian-especialy ones related with the wolf) mixed or covered by christianity who survived up to XX century, there is even linguistic prouves etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.116.211.230 (talk) 08:54, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your changes were reverted by another user... Too bad you didn't sign in as a user... Your contributions are welcomed but watch spellings and add references. I am running the Wikipedia:WikiProject Dacia. If you have an interest in the topic, please join Wikipedia and the project.--Codrin.B (talk) 19:21, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article's a mess. The subject matter itself is controversial - and it doesn't help that it has so many parts that assert something with no citation. "The Free Dacians, together with the Roman-Dacians, later developed into the Romanian people of nowadays." - this article's an epitome of modern day nationalism being tried to be combined with ancient history, and it needs serious rewriting from a neutral point of view. --82.181.143.171 (talk) 05:13, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]